Problem related to initialization of AMF

Submitted by jatinder on Tue, 2007-01-09 05:30.

Hi,

I have defined two nodes and made the image and wanted to run on the target
machine, I am faced with following problems. Could you please help me in resolving this issue?

============================================================

PID[21066]:File[atca.c]:Func[openFd]:Line[488]: Unable to open device

PID[21066]:File[cpm/clCpmComponent.c]:Func[_cpmSaAwareComponentInstantiate]:Line[3275]: Image name : [sisp_logd], PID : [21072]

PID[21066]:File[cpm/clCpmComponent.c]:Func[_cpmSaAwareComponentInstantiate]:Line[3275]: Image name : [sisp_gms], PID : [21077]

Leader = 1, deputy = -1, leadershipChanged = 1, numberOfItems = 1
Updating the ACTIVE ENTRY with compId 65536 1
Delete the old Master

PID[21066]:File[cpm/clCpmGms.c]:Func[cpmHandleGroupInformation]:Line[463]: Unable to initialize AMS, rc=[0x220108]
AMS Termination Completed

PID[21072]:File[clLogServerMain.c]:Func[clLogSvrTerminate]:Line[228]: Unregistering with cpm...... [logServer_ControlCard]

PID[21072]:File[clLogServerMain.c]:Func[clLogSvrFinalize]:Line[473]: Log Server Exitting Gracefully....

Submitted by harikrishna_gp on Tue, 2007-01-09 19:20.

Jatinder,
I am assuming that you are using evaluation kit.
From the messages displayed it looks like you have some other sisp instance running in the same network.
Also take a look at http://www.openclovis.org/errors-at-sisp-start#comment-114
If your network has firewall enabled then you might see similar behavior.

Thanks,
Hari

Submitted by jatinder on Tue, 2007-01-09 23:28.

Hari,

No, I have created my own model with two nodes, two SGs per node, each
SG having one SU and SI and each SU having four components and four
CSIs with no redundancy. I have tried everything mentioned in comment 114 but still its not working.

Simple model having one node, one SU and two components is working on same
machine.

-Jatinder

Submitted by nv on Wed, 2007-01-10 00:00.

The error 0x220108 is parsed as follows:

220 is the AMS module
108 indicates "invalid entity"

Check your model. There is some modeling error that is being caught by the run time validations and causing AMS to terminate.

If you can't find it, you may want to post your amfConfig.xml and amfDefinitions.xml files from the model directory.

Submitted by jatinder on Wed, 2007-01-10 01:42.

Problem solved. Thanks a lot!!
-Jatinder

Submitted by AndrewStone on Fri, 2007-01-12 15:55.

What was the problem?

Submitted by jatinder on Tue, 2007-01-16 08:47.

I modelled SIs dependent on each other which was caught
by a AMF runtime check.